Suchergebnisse

6944 Artikel wurden gefunden.

Die folgenden Begriffe wurden einbezogen: Mobilfunk, Mobilkommunikation, "mobile communication", "cellular radio", "mobile radio", セルラー無線, 移動無線

• 2010, Hardell L, Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Zetterberg H, Hansson Mild K
  [Details] Exposure to wireless phone emissions and serum beta-trace protein [epidem.]
  Int J Mol Med 26 (2): 301-306
• 2010, Breckenkamp J, Blettner M, Kowall B, Schüz J, Schlehofer B, Schmiedel S, Bornkessel C, Reis U, Potthoff P, Berg-Beckhoff G
  [Details] Ergebnisse einer Querschnittsstudie zum Zusammenhang von elektromagnetischen Feldern von Mobilfunksendeanlagen und unspezifischen gesundheitlichen Beschwerden [epidem.]
  Umweltmed Forsch Prax 15 (3): 159-166
• 2010, Han J, Cao Z, Liu X, Zhang W, Zhang S
  [Effect of early pregnancy electromagnetic field exposure on embryo growth ceasing] [fremdsprachig]
  Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 39 (3): 349-352
• 2010, Bithell JF
  Childhood cancer and proximity to mobile phone masts [Kommentar]
  BMJ 340: c3015
• 2010, Elliott P, Toledano MB, Bennett J, Beale L, de Hoogh K, Best N, Briggs DJ
  [Details] Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study [epidem.]
  BMJ 340: c3077
• 2010, Balmori A
  [Details] Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory [med./bio.]
  Electromagn Biol Med 29 (1-2): 31-35
• 2010, Mohler E, Frei P, Braun-Fahrländer C, Fröhlich J, Neubauer G, Röösli M
  [Details] Effects of everyday radiofrequency electromagnetic-field exposure on sleep quality: a cross-sectional study [epidem.]
  Radiat Res 174 (3): 347-356
• 2010, Kraus W
  [Mobile phone radiation - a medical debate?] [fremdsprachig]
  Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 130 (10): 1015
• 2010, Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K
  [Details] Mobile Phone Use and the Risk for Malignant Brain Tumors: A Case-Control Study on Deceased Cases and Controls [epidem.]
  Neuroepidemiology 35 (2): 109-114
• 2010, Kundi M
  Mobile Phone Use and Brain Cancer: Is the Association Biased? [Kommentar]
  Neuroepidemiology 35 (2): 115-116