この論文は、GTEMセル内での変調および非変調の1966MHz電磁界へのばく露に対する、ジャーカットT細胞の反応についての実験の構成および手順、ならびにイン・ビトロ評価について述べている。異なる組合せの電界強度、ばく露時間および変調方式を適用した。その結果、低レベル(3V/m)の連続波信号へのばく露は有意なDNA損傷を生じなかったが、極端なストレスレベル(76.4V/m)では僅かな増加が認められた。他方、低および高電界強度のUMTS信号はどちらも、イン・ビトロでのDNA損傷と統計的に関連付けられた。
The detailed summary of this article is not available in your language or incomplete. Would you like to see a complete translation of the summary? Then please contact us →
The genotoxic effect of exposure of Jurkat cells to 1966 MHz electromagnetic fields should be investigated.
Several fields with different field strengths, exposure durations and either a continuous wave signal or UMTS modulation were investigated. For each field, a total of 20 exposed and 4 sham-exposed cell culture tubes was examined. Further 4 exposed tubes per field were used for temperature measurement. Additionally, an unknown number of tubes were used as the control group.
ばく露 | パラメータ |
---|---|
ばく露1:
1,966 MHz
Modulation type:
CW
ばく露時間:
continuous for 10 minutes
|
|
ばく露2:
1,966 MHz
Modulation type:
CW
ばく露時間:
continuous for 120 minutes
|
|
ばく露3:
1,966 MHz
Modulation type:
CW
ばく露時間:
continuous for 10 minutes
|
|
ばく露4:
1,966 MHz
Modulation type:
CW
ばく露時間:
continuous for 120 minutes
|
|
ばく露5:
1,966 MHz
ばく露時間:
continuous for 10 minutes
|
|
ばく露6:
1,966 MHz
ばく露時間:
continuous for 120 minutes
|
|
ばく露7:
1,966 MHz
ばく露時間:
continuous for 10 minutes
|
|
ばく露8:
1,966 MHz
ばく露時間:
continuous for 120 minutes
|
周波数 | 1,966 MHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
ばく露時間 | continuous for 10 minutes |
Modulation type | CW |
---|
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
チャンバの詳細 | dielectric tubes in a rack |
ばく露装置の詳細 | the GTEM cell had outer dimensions of 3.95 m x 2.02 m x 1.95 m |
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
DNA damage was significantly increased in sham exposed cells of all groups compared to the control group. For continuous wave exposure, only high intensity fields (groups 3 and 4) showed a slight but significantly increased level of DNA damage compared to sham exposed cells. However, UMTS exposure resulted in signficantly increased DNA damage in all exposure groups (groups 5-8) compared to sham exposed cells.
The temperature increase during exposure was 0.1°C in the groups with the lowest field strength (groups 2 and 6) and most distinct in groups with the highest field strength and longest exposure duration (groups 4 and 8 with 1.2°C and 1.3°C, respectively). As there were only small differences observed between corresponding groups of continuous wave and UMTS exposure, it was assumed that the temperature increase was associated to electric field intensity more than to modulation scheme.
Exposure to the electromagnetic fields had no effect on cell viability.
The authors conclude that exposure to a UMTS 1966 MHz electromagnetic field might be related to DNA damage in Jurkat cells.
このウェブサイトはクッキー(Cookies)を使って、最善のブラウジングエクスペリエンスを提供しています。あなたがこのウェブサイトを継続して使用することで、私たちがクッキーを使用することを許可することになります。