この研究は、公共保安用無線通信の欧州統一規格であるTETRA様信号(16Hzパルス化無線周波電磁界)へのばく露時に主観的症状が生じるか否かを調べたボランティア実験である。被験者(TETRA使用者でEHS者60名と非EHS者60名)に3通りの実験セッション(16Hzパルス波信号ばく露、連続波信号ばく露、擬似ばく露)をいずれも50分間を行った。16Hzパルス波と連続波の平均出力は250mWであった。各セッションの実施順序は無作為、実験は二重ブラインドであった。ばく露中およびばく露終了後に8症状の重症度、ばく露終了時の気分、自分に作用する信号がどのセッションに含まれていたかを報告させた。その結果、連続波ばく露では、全被験者で頭痛の評点上昇、非EHS群で疲労感の評点上昇、EHS群で集中力の評点低下と皮膚掻痒感の評点低下が見られた;16Hzパルス波ばく露では、集中力以外の影響は示されなかった;多重比較を補正すると大半の影響は排除されたが、皮膚掻痒感に関する影響は排除されなかった、と報告している。
The detailed summary of this article is not available in your language or incomplete. Would you like to see a complete translation of the summary? Then please contact us →
To test whether exposure to a continuous wave signal at 385.25 MHz or a TETRA-like signal resulted in acute symptoms among regular TETRA users reporting sensitivity to TETRA compared to users not reporting sensitivity to TETRA.
60 sensitive and 60 non-sensitive participants were exposed to three 50 minutes conditions: a signal with a 16 Hz component, a continuous wave condition and a sham exposure. Questionnaires were completed before exposure and after 5, 15, 30 and 50 minutes during the exposure. After a resting period of 30 minutes, the participant was asked whether he thought the radio had emitted a signal and how confident he was about this.
ばく露 | パラメータ |
---|---|
ばく露1:
385.25 MHz
Modulation type:
CW
ばく露時間:
continuous for 50 min
|
|
ばく露2:
385.25 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
ばく露時間:
continuous for 50 min
|
周波数 | 385.25 MHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
ばく露時間 | continuous for 50 min |
Modulation type | CW |
---|
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
ばく露装置の詳細 | handset attached to the test person's head via a headband so that the antenna was positioned above and slightly behind the left ear within a few millimeters of the head |
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
周波数 | 385.25 MHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
ばく露時間 | continuous for 50 min |
Modulation type | pulsed |
---|---|
Repetition frequency | 16 Hz |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
Exposure to the continuous wave signal increased ratings of headache in all participants, fatigue in non-sensitive participants and difficulty concentrating in sensitive participants. Paradoxically, exposure reduced sensations of itching in sensitive participants. These effects were not observed in the condition with 16 Hz pulsing (TETRA-like), except for those relating to concentration. Statistical analysis (multiple comparisons) removed most significant effects, but not those relating to itch.
Neither sensitive nor non-sensitive participants could discriminate between the exposures during the experiment, nor could they tell which session was most likely to have been sham exposure or which was most likely to have been TETRA.
In conclusion, these data suggest that exposure to TETRA signals is not responsible for symptoms reported by some users, although exposure to a continuous wave signal may affect symptoms.
このウェブサイトはクッキー(Cookies)を使って、最善のブラウジングエクスペリエンスを提供しています。あなたがこのウェブサイトを継続して使用することで、私たちがクッキーを使用することを許可することになります。