この論文は、学術誌の特集に掲載されたものであり、携帯電話の電磁界へのばく露に関する生物学的および健康への影響を解説している。内容について、最も重要な実験的、臨床的、統計的な知見を簡単にレビューする;特に、モデル生物学的システムでの細胞の死滅の誘導に関する一連の実験について、以下のように広範に情報を提供する;携帯電話の電磁放射は、数分間/日でのわずか数日間のばく露で、昆虫の繁殖を有意に、非熱的に、最大60 %低下させることが示されている;この影響は、生殖腺のDNA断片化によるものであり、等しい条件下において強度が高いGSMの方が、DCSよりも生物への作用が大きいことが示されている;生殖能力の低下は、電磁界強度に非線形に依存するように見え、200 μW/ cm2を超えると一つのピークが見られる他に、約10 μW/ cm2付近の強度の「窓」で最大値を示すようである;最後に、この論文では、携帯電話の電磁放射が生物に及ぼす記録された影響を説明できる、もっともらしい生物物理学的および生化学的メカニズムについて説明する、と概説している。
The detailed summary of this article is not available in your language or incomplete. Would you like to see a complete translation of the summary? Then please contact us →
This article consists of a review of biological, clinical and epidemiological data and an experimental study. In the following only the experimental study is presented.
To study the effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic irradiation at 900 MHz (emitted by GSM mobile phones) and at 1800 MHz (emitted by DCS mobile phones) on reproductive capacity of the insect Drosophila melanogaster and the dependency of the effect of different electromagnetic field parameters (e.g. intensity, carrier frequency, distance from antenna).
There were six sets of experiments: 1) GSM 900 MHz exposure in non-speaking mode (non-modulated), 2) mobile phone exposure in speaking mode (modulated emission, GSM), 3) investigation of effects of the mobile phone GSM signal on the reproductive capacity of each sex separately, 4) comparison of bioactivity between GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz, 5) exposure of insects at different distances (0-100 cm), both types of exposure, 6) effects on DNA fragmentation (cell death) in the ovarian cells. In each experiment different exposed and sham exposed groups were used.
Each group consisted of ten female and ten male newly emerged flies kept in separate vials for the first 48 h. After the 48 h, when both males and females of each group were sexually mature, they were put together (10 pairs) in another glass vial and they were allowed to mate and lay eggs for the next 72 h.
For cell death investigation ovarioles were investigated (background information about ovarioles, see Panagopoulos 2007b).
ばく露 | パラメータ |
---|---|
ばく露1:
900 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
ばく露時間:
continuous for 6 min/day on 5 days
investigation of non-modulated GSM exposure on the reproductive capacity
|
|
ばく露2:
900 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
ばく露時間:
continuous for 6 min/day on 5 days
investigation of GSM exposure on the reproductive capacity
|
|
ばく露3:
900 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
ばく露時間:
continuous for 6 min/day on 2 days
investigation of each sex separately
|
|
ばく露4:
900–1,800 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
ばく露時間:
continuous for 6 min/day on 5 days
comparison of GSM 900 and DCS 1800 exposure
|
|
ばく露5:
900–1,800 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
ばく露時間:
continuous for 6 min/day on 5 days
experiment with different distances (i.e. intensities)
|
|
ばく露6:
900–1,800 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
ばく露時間:
continuous for 6 min/day on 6 days
cell death experiment
|
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
ばく露装置の詳細 | flies kept in 10 cm high glass vials with a diameter of 2.5 cm, closed with a cotton plug; during exposure plug pushed down in the vial to about 1 cm from the ground; mobile phone placed outside the vial in contact to it |
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
測定量 | 値 | 種別 | Method | Mass | 備考 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
電力 | 2 W | - | - | - | - |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
測定量 | 値 | 種別 | Method | Mass | 備考 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
電力 | 2 W | - | - | - | - |
周波数 | 900 MHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
ばく露時間 | continuous for 6 min/day on 2 days |
Additional information | investigation of each sex separately |
Additional information | GSM phone in speaking mode flies were treated in four groups: i) male and female flies exposed ii) only female flies exposed iii) only male flies exposed iv) male and female flies sham exposed |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
測定量 | 値 | 種別 | Method | Mass | 備考 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
電力 | 2 W | - | - | - | - |
周波数 | 900–1,800 MHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
ばく露時間 | continuous for 6 min/day on 5 days |
Additional information | comparison of GSM 900 and DCS 1800 exposure |
Additional information | flies were treated in four groups: i) GSM 900 exposure with the phone's antenna in contact to the vial ii) GSM 900 exposure with the phone's antenna at 1 cm distance to the vial iii) DCS 1800 exposure with the phone's antenna in contact to the vial iv) sham exposure |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
測定量 | 値 | 種別 | Method | Mass | 備考 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
電界強度 | 22.3 V/m | average over time | 測定値 | - | +/- 2.2 V/m ELF component for group i) |
磁束密度 | 0.05 µT | average over time | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.008 µT ELF component for group i) |
電力密度 | 0.407 mW/cm² | - | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.061 mW/cm² for group i) |
電界強度 | 13.9 V/m | average over time | 測定値 | - | +/- 1.6 V/m for group ii) |
磁束密度 | 0.04 µT | average over time | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.007 µT for group ii) |
電力密度 | 0.286 mW/cm² | - | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.05 mW/cm² for group ii) |
電界強度 | 14.2 V/m | average over time | 測定値 | - | +/- 1.7 V/m for group iii) |
磁束密度 | 0.038 µT | average over time | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.007 µT for group iii) |
電力密度 | 0.283 mW/cm² | - | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.043 mW/cm² for group iii) |
SAR | 0.89 W/kg | maximum | - | - | manufacturer's data for the head |
電力 | 2 W | - | - | - | for GSM |
電力 | 1 W | - | - | - | for DCS |
周波数 | 900–1,800 MHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
ばく露時間 | continuous for 6 min/day on 5 days |
Additional information | experiment with different distances (i.e. intensities) |
Additional information | flies were treated in 13 groups: i) GSM 900 or DCS 1800 exposure with the phone's antenna in contact to the vial ii) GSM 900 or DCS 1800 exposure with the phone's antenna at 1 cm distance to the vial iii) GSM 900 or DCS 1800 exposure with the phone's antenna at 10 cm distance to the vial iv)GSM 900 or DCS 1800 exposure with the phone's antenna at 20 cm distance to the vial . . . xii) GSM 900 or DCS 1800 exposure with the phone's antenna at 100 cm distance to the vial xiii) sham exposure |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
測定量 | 値 | 種別 | Method | Mass | 備考 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAR | 0.89 W/kg | maximum | - | - | manufacturer's data for the head |
電力 | 2 W | - | - | - | for GSM |
電力 | 1 W | - | - | - | for DCS |
電力密度 | 0.38 mW/cm² | maximum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.058 mW/cm² for GSM at 0 cm distance |
電力密度 | 0.0004 mW/cm² | minimum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.0001 mW/cm² for GSM at 100 cm distance |
電界強度 | 19 V/m | maximum | 測定値 | - | +/- 2.5 V/m for GSM at 0 cm distance |
電界強度 | 0.1 V/m | minimum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.02 V/m for GSM at 50 cm distance |
磁束密度 | 0.09 µT | maximum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.015 µT for GSM at 0 cm distance |
磁束密度 | 0.005 µT | minimum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.001 µT for GSM at 40 cm distance |
電力密度 | 0.25 mW/cm² | maximum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.048 mW/cm² for DCS at 0 cm distance |
電力密度 | 0.0002 mW/cm² | minimum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.0001 mW/cm² for DCS at 100 cm distance |
電界強度 | 13 V/m | maximum | 測定値 | - | +/- 2.1 V/m for DCS at 0 cm distance |
電界強度 | 0.1 V/m | minimum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.04 V/m for DCS at 40 cm distance |
磁束密度 | 0.06 µT | maximum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.008 µT for DCS at 0 cm distance |
磁束密度 | 0.006 µT | minimum | 測定値 | - | +/- 0.001 µT for DCS at 30 cm distance |
周波数 | 900–1,800 MHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
ばく露時間 | continuous for 6 min/day on 6 days |
Additional information | cell death experiment |
Additional information | flies were treated in five groups: i) GSM 900 exposure with the phone's antenna in contact to the vial ii) GSM 900 exposure with the phone's antenna at 1 cm distance to the vial iii) DCS 1800 exposure with the phone's antenna in contact to the vial iv) sham exposure v) control |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
A few minutes of daily mobile phone exposure for only a few days significantly decreased the insect reproduction by up to 60% (experiment 2 with the modulated field). Both sexes were found to be affected, but females were more affected than the males. The effect was due to DNA fragmentation in the gonads caused by both types of digital mobile phone radiation (GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz).
GSM exposure was more bioactive than DCS exposure, due to its higher intensity under equal conditions. The decrease in reproductive capacity seemed to be non-linearly depended on irradiation intensity, exhibiting a peak for intensities higher than 200 µW/cm² and a window effect around µ10W/cm². This intensity "window" appeared at a distance of 20-30 cm from the mobile phone antenna.
このウェブサイトはクッキー(Cookies)を使って、最善のブラウジングエクスペリエンスを提供しています。あなたがこのウェブサイトを継続して使用することで、私たちがクッキーを使用することを許可することになります。