この研究は、Fischer344ラットの発がん率に対する1.6GHz無線周波(RF)への長期ばく露の影響を調べた。妊娠時期を調整した妊娠ラットへの遠方界ばく露実験(母ラットへのばく露レベルは、胎仔脳の平均SARで0.16W/kgとなるように設定し、妊娠19日目から、1日2時間、週7日で、出生仔の離乳(~23日齢)まで継続)と、胎児期から離乳期までばく露した仔ラットへの近傍界ばく露実験(1日2時間、週5日で36±1日齢から2歳まで継続)を行った。母ラットへの遠方界ばく露実験は、妊娠雌ラットのばく露群72匹(36匹1群として2群で実験)、擬似ばく露群36匹。ケージコントロール群42匹とした。仔ラットへの近傍界ばく露実験は、雌雄各90匹1群としてばく露群2群(2レベル:脳内SARで1.6、0.16 W/kg)、擬似ばく露群1群、および雌雄各80匹のケージコントロール群とした(仔ラット実験は合計700匹)。その結果、遠方界ばく露群では、生存出生数/腹、生存指数、離乳時体重、臨床症状、腫瘍病変に有意差はなかった;近傍界ばく露仔ラッが実験終了まで生存した割合は、雄では差がなかったが、雌ではケージ対照群で生存時間の減少が見られた、と報告している。
The detailed summary of this article is not available in your language or incomplete. Would you like to see a complete translation of the summary? Then please contact us →
To determine whether long-term exposure to a 1.6 GHz radiofrequency field would affect the incidence of cancer in rats. Whole-body far field exposures of pregnant rats were initiated at 19 days of gestation and continued for dams and pups after parturition until weaning (approximately 23 days old). The offspring of these dams were selected for near field treatment (divided in male and female groups). Near field exposures were initiated when the offspring were 36 +/- 1 days old and continued until the rats were 2 years old.
ばく露 | パラメータ |
---|---|
ばく露1:
1.62 GHz
ばく露時間:
repeated daily exposure, 2 h/day, for about 27 days
|
|
ばく露2:
1.62 GHz
ばく露時間:
repeated daily exposure, 2 h/day, 5 days/week, from 35 days up to about 2 years of age
|
周波数 | 1.62 GHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
特性 |
|
ばく露時間 | repeated daily exposure, 2 h/day, for about 27 days |
Modulation type | cf. additional information |
---|---|
Additional information |
Iridium signal with differentially encoded quaternary phase shift keying (DEQPSK) and a frame length of 90 ms with 11 data slots per frame |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
Distance between exposed object and exposure source | 3 m |
チャンバの詳細 | The exposure setup used a horizontal beam orientation in a flared plate design [Wilson et al., 2002]. The parallel-plate enclosure (2.48 m long) was lined with copper foil on top and bottom plates, and the sides were covered with pyramidal anechoic material. It was excited by a coaxial to waveguide adapter and provided for RF exposure (23 dB beam width) at the position of the animal cages in an area of 2.11 x 1.11 m at 3 to 3.5 m (approx. 12 λ) from the antenna, with a uniformity of better than 62.6 dB. |
ばく露装置の詳細 | Eighteen standard rat cages (45.7 x 24.1 x 20.3 cm) containing single rats with their offspring were located in a box (1.45 x 2.40 x 1.60 m) covered on five of the interior walls with pyramidal or grooved anechoic material. The cages were arranged in three rows of six cages with their front surfaces in the plane of the parallel plate aperture. The sham system was installed in an adjoining room. |
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
Additional information | Whole-body far-field exposures were initiated at 19 days of gestation and continued for dams and pups after parturition until weaning at about 23 days of age. The animal groups were not exposed in a blinded fashion. |
周波数 | 1.62 GHz |
---|---|
タイプ |
|
特性 |
|
ばく露時間 | repeated daily exposure, 2 h/day, 5 days/week, from 35 days up to about 2 years of age |
Modulation type | cf. additional information |
---|---|
Additional information |
Iridium signal with differentially encoded quaternary phase shift keying (DEQPSK) and a frame length of 90 ms with 11 data slots per frame |
ばく露の発生源/構造 |
|
---|---|
チャンバの詳細 | The exposure facility contained nine partially shielded double units each housing two near-field exposure carousels that were similar to those described by Moros et al. [1998]. RF absorbing material was placed around each exposure unit. |
ばく露装置の詳細 | Ten animals per carousel were placed with their head first in cylindrical tubes arranged radially around a central antenna. |
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
Additional information | Six of the units were assigned to each of the three exposure conditions that were rotated every six weeks among the three zones. The animal groups were coded after far-field exposure so that near-field exposure and sham exposure were truly blind. |
No statistically significant differences were revealed among treatment groups for number of live pups/litter, survival rate, and weaning weights, nor were there differences in clinical signs or neoplastic lesions. The percentages of rats surviving at the end of the near field irradiation were not different among the male groups. In the female groups a significant decrease in survival time was found for the cage control group.
このウェブサイトはクッキー(Cookies)を使って、最善のブラウジングエクスペリエンスを提供しています。あなたがこのウェブサイトを継続して使用することで、私たちがクッキーを使用することを許可することになります。