To study the effects of 50 Hz sinusoidal extremely low frequency magnetic field and GSM 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and to identify and compare the EMF-responsive genes of these two frequencies.
Heat shock treatment served as positive control.
Exposure | Parameters |
---|---|
Exposure 1:
50 Hz
Exposure duration:
continuous for 6 h
|
|
Exposure 2:
1,800 MHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
Exposure duration:
intermittent, 5 min "on" - 10 min "off" for 6 h
|
|
Frequency | 50 Hz |
---|---|
Type | |
Waveform | |
Exposure duration | continuous for 6 h |
Exposure source |
|
---|---|
Setup | three groups of 36 cm x 36 cm square copper coils placed inside a CO2 incubator; upper, middle and lower coils connected in series and spaced 8 cm apart; coil system placed inside an iron container with ventilation holes; magnetic field uniform in a 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm area in the center of the coil system, where the 100 mm Petri dishes were placed |
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
magnetic flux density | 0.4 mT | - | measured | - | - |
Frequency | 1,800 MHz |
---|---|
Type | |
Exposure duration | intermittent, 5 min "on" - 10 min "off" for 6 h |
Exposure source | |
---|---|
Setup | waveguide placed inside a cell culture incubator; six 35 mm Petri dishes placed inside the waveguide at the H-field maximum of the standing wave |
Sham exposure | A sham exposure was conducted. |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAR | 4.7 W/kg | average over time | calculated | - | in the lowest 8 µm of the Petri dish bottom |
Microarray-detected expression changes in three of the extremely low frequency magnetic field responsive candidate genes could not be confirmed using RT-PCR. On the other hand, out of the 40 potential radiofrequency electromagnetic field-responsive genes, only the expressions of two genes were confirmed by RT-PCR (structural maintenance of chromosomes 3 (SMC3) and aquaporin 2), while three other genes showed opposite changes in expression (downregulation) compared to the microarray data (upregulation).
In conclusion, the findings suggest that the yeast cells did not alter gene expression in response to the 50 Hz extremely low frequency magnetic field and that the response to the radiofrequency electromagnetic field is limited to only a very small number of genes. Further studies are needed to address whether the observed changes in gene expression might have any impact on Saccharomyces cerevisiae physiology.
This website uses cookies to provide you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this website you accept our use of cookies.