In a case study, the hypothesis was investigated whether the symptoms assigned to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) which a previously healthy office worker developed after moving to another office might be attributed to the exposure to electromagnetic fields.
A 55 year old previously healthy female office worker changed her work place to another office at the 6th floor close to base stations on the roof. She had worked in the same building for almost 10 years at another location without health problems. During the following months after she had changed office she experienced increasing health problems. She attributed the symptoms to the working place, as the symptoms diminished while being away from the premises and reappeared and increased when back.
Exposure | Parameters |
---|---|
Exposure 1: 5 Hz–400 kHz |
|
Exposure 2:
16.7 Hz
electric train
|
|
Exposure 3: 50 Hz |
|
Exposure 4: 2–400 kHz |
|
Exposure 5:
87–5,850 MHz
radiofrequency total
|
|
Exposure 6:
87–5,850 MHz
radiofrequency total without downlink
|
|
Exposure 7: |
|
Exposure 8:
TETRA I
|
|
Exposure 9: |
|
Exposure 10: |
|
Exposure 11: |
|
Measurements were conducted in the office on a business day afternoon
Frequency | 5 Hz–400 kHz |
---|---|
Type |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
magnetic flux density | 135 nT | minimum | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 284 nT | mean | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 497 nT | maximum | measured | - | - |
Frequency | 16.7 Hz |
---|---|
Type | |
Additional info | electric train |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
magnetic flux density | 0 nT | minimum | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 76 nT | mean | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 383 nT | maximum | measured | - | - |
Frequency | 50 Hz |
---|---|
Type |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
magnetic flux density | 0 nT | minimum | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 241 nT | mean | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 285 nT | maximum | measured | - | - |
Frequency | 2–400 kHz |
---|---|
Type |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
magnetic flux density | 0 nT | minimum | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 1.8 nT | mean | measured | - | - |
magnetic flux density | 3.5 nT | maximum | measured | - | - |
Frequency | 87–5,850 MHz |
---|---|
Type | |
Additional info | radiofrequency total |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 423.5 µW/m² | minimum | measured | - | - |
power density | 1,098.7 µW/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 4,183.8 µW/m² | maximum | measured | - | - |
Frequency | 87–5,850 MHz |
---|---|
Type | |
Additional info | radiofrequency total without downlink |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 5 µW/m² | minimum | measured | - | - |
power density | 34.9 µW/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 1,585.4 µW/m² | maximum | measured | - | - |
Frequency | |
---|---|
Type | |
Additional info | FM radio broadcasting |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 0 nW/m² | minimum | measured | - | - |
power density | 0.8 nW/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 45.5 nW/m² | maximum | measured | - | - |
Frequency | |
---|---|
Type | |
Additional info | TETRA I |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 0 µW/m² | minimum | measured | - | - |
power density | 16.3 µW/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 1,520 µW/m² | maximum | measured | - | - |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 18.3 µW/m² | minimum | measured | - | - |
power density | 132.1 µW/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 1,480.1 µW/m² | maximum | measured | - | - |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 38.8 µW/m² | minimum | measured | - | - |
power density | 269.6 µW/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 1,340.9 µW/m² | maximum | measured | - | - |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 26 µW/m² | minimum | measured | - | - |
power density | 181.9 µW/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 2,077.5 µW/m² | maximum | measured | - | - |
All measured field levels were within the current safety limits, however the working premises were demonstrating elevated exposure levels both to the radio frequency electromagnetic field and the extremely low frequency magnetic field. (Remark EMF-Portal: Exposure data of the former office were not provided.)
The authors concluded that the exposure to electromagnetic fields at the working place could be the cause for developing EHS-related symptoms. The association was strengthened by the symptom reduction outside the working place.
This website uses cookies to provide you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this website you accept our use of cookies.