New search

DECT base station

Belongs to:
DECT
Synonyms:
Fixed part
Description:

DECT is a telecommunication standard for cordless telephony and wireless data transmission. DECT is designed primarily for the communication of a few participants within a building, it has a range of 30 - 50 m.

DECT is an abbreviation for Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications.

Frequency ranges:
  • 1,880–1,900 MHz (within the L band)
Type of field:
electromagnetic

Measurements (acc. to literature)

Measurand Value Feature Remarks
SAR 7.14 µW/kg (maximum) - max. value, whole-body SAR of 1-year-old child [1]
SAR 0.01 mW/kg (maximum, measured) - averaged over the whole body of a 1- to 10-year-old child at a distance of 50 cm [2]
SAR 0.03 mW/kg (maximum, calculated) - averaged over the whole body of a 7- to 10-year-old child at a distance of 30 cm [2]
SAR 0.04 mW/kg (maximum, calculated) - averaged over over the whole body of a 1- to 6-year-old child at a distance of 30 cm [2]
electric field strength 0.3 V/m (measured) - at a distance of 100 cm [2]
electric field strength 0.8 V/m (measured) - at a distance of 50 cm [2]
electric field strength 1.7 V/m (measured) - - [2]
electric field strength 0.07 V/m (maximum, measured) - average value of 18 participants, who were monitored with an RF exposimeter for 24h [3]
electric field strength 0.1 V/m (maximum) - averaged over 30 different measurement points [4]
electric field strength 0.41 V/m (maximum) - measured during the day at an office [1]
electric field strength 1.18 V/m (maximum) - maximum value out of 77 measuring sights in urban areas [5]
electric field strength 1.54 V/m (maximum) - maximum value out of 50 measuring sight in suburban areas [5]
electric field strength 1.7 V/m (maximum) - Binatone LB617: at a distance of 25 cm [6]
electric field strength 2 V/m (maximum) - Siemens Gigaset 3015: at a distance of 25 cm [6]
electric field strength 2.67 V/m (maximum) - maximum value out of 311 measuring sites [5]
electric field strength 2.67 V/m (maximum) - maximum value out 54 measuring sights in industrial areas [5]
electric field strength 5 V/m (maximum, measured) - maximum value of 18 participants, who were monitored with an RF exposimeter for 24h [3]
electric field strength 40 V/m (maximum) - Simens Gigaset 3015, Binatone LB617: at the surface of the device [6]
power density 0.0053 µW/m² (measured) - in rural areas of Sweden [7]
power density 0.13 µW/m² (measured) - in the capital city of Sweden (Stockholm) [7]
power density 0.13 µW/m² (measured) - in urban areas [7]
power density 170.52 µW/m² (measured) - averaged over 213 measurements in 2009 [8]
power density 211.78 µW/m² (maximum) - arithmetic mean value out of 130 measuring sights in 2009 [8]
power density 0.3 mW/m² (maximum) - without phone call [9]
power density 0.4 mW/m² (maximum) - during a phone call [9]
power density 428.27 µW/m² (maximum) - arithmetic mean value out of 130 measuring sights in 2006 [8]
power density 4.436–5.968 mW/m² (measured) - at a distance of 3 m at a power of 250 mW [10]
power density 19.19–34.57 mW/m² (measured) - - [10]
power 0.25 W–20 nW (maximum) - antenna power output [11]

References

  1. Joseph W et al. (2010): Estimation of whole-body SAR from electromagnetic fields using personal exposure meters
  2. Ibrani M et al. (2014): Assessment of the exposure of children to electromagnetic fields from wireless communication devices in home environments
  3. Valic B et al. (2015): Typical exposure of children to EMF: exposimetry and dosimetry
  4. Joseph W et al. (2010): Assessment of general public exposure to LTE and RF sources present in an urban environment
  5. Joseph W et al. (2012): Assessment of RF exposures from emerging wireless communication technologies in different environments
  6. Kramer A et al. (2005): Development of Procedures for the Assessment of Human Exposure to EMF from Wireless Devices in Home and Office Environments. ITIS Foundation
  7. Estenberg J et al. (2014): Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system
  8. Tomitsch J et al. (2012): Trends in residential exposure to electromagnetic fields from 2006 to 2009
  9. Frei P et al. (2010): Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: Evaluation of different exposure assessment methods
  10. Schmid G et al. (2007): Exposure caused by wireless technologies used for short-range indoor communication in homes and offices
  11. Otto M et al. (2007): Electromagnetic fields (EMF): Do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?