To study operant behavior and colonic temperature of rhesus monkeys exposed to radiofrequency fields and to determine the minimal power densities affecting performance.
The animals were trained to press a lever (observing-response) thereby producing signals that indicated availability of food. In the presence of the aperiodically appearing food signals, a detection response on a different lever was reinforced by food.
Exposure | Parameters |
---|---|
Exposure 1:
255 MHz
Modulation type:
CW
|
|
Exposure 2:
1.3 GHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
|
|
Exposure 3:
5.8 GHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
|
|
Modulation type | CW |
---|
Exposure source | |
---|---|
Distance between exposed object and exposure source | 0.24 m |
Chamber | Anechoic chamber shielded by metal. |
Setup | Animals were restrained in chairs and their heads were aligned with the center of the horn. |
Additional info | Animal was 0.78 times the far-field distance. |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 50 W/m² | minimum | measured | - | to 11 mW/cm² |
power density | 81 W/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
Modulation type | pulsed |
---|---|
Pulse width | 3 µs |
Repetition frequency | 370 Hz |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 570 W/m² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 200 W/m² | mean | measured | - | to 95 mW/cm² |
Modulation type | pulsed |
---|---|
Pulse width | 500 ns |
Packets per second | 662 |
Additional info |
0.5 or 2 µs pulse width |
Exposure source |
|
---|
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 140 mW/cm² | mean | measured | - | - |
power density | 110 W/m² | minimum | measured | - | to 150 mW/cm² |
Observing-response performance was impaired at increasingly higher power densities as frequency increased from the near-resonance 225 MHz to the above-resonance 5.8 GHz.
The threshold power density of disrupted response rate at 225 MHz was 8.1 mW/cm²; at 1.3 GHz it was 57 mW/cm², and at 5.8 GHz it was 140 mW/cm². These power densities were associated with reliable increases in colonic temperatures above sham-irradiated levels. The mean increase was in the range of 1°C, and response-rate changes were not found in the absence of concomitant temperature increases.
In these experiments elevation of colonic temperature was a much better predictor of behavioral disruption than was either the power density of the incident field or estimates of whole-body-averaged rates of energy absorption.
This website uses cookies to provide you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this website you accept our use of cookies.