To produce observing- and detecting behavior in rats exposed to microwaves.
Depression of one lever produced one of two different tones and the other lever produced food pellets when depressed in the presence of the appropriate tone. The purpose of these experiments was to discover the power density at which animals working on a vigilance task exhibit behavioral disruption when exposed at two different frequencies (1.28 and 5.62 GHz).
Exposure | Parameters |
---|---|
Exposure 1:
1.28 GHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
|
|
Exposure 2:
5.62 GHz
Modulation type:
pulsed
|
|
Modulation type | pulsed |
---|---|
Pulse width | 3 µs |
Repetition frequency | 370 Hz |
Exposure source | |
---|---|
Chamber | microwave anechoic exposure chamber 3.40 x 2.20 x 2.35m, absorber-lined, styrofoam box 30 x 25.5 x.20 cm dxlxw |
Setup | The right side of the animal was irradiated while the animal was level responding |
Additional info | Horizontal propagation was used with the E-vector vertically polarized. |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 10 W/m² | minimum | measured | - | 5.5 mW/cm², 9.5 mW/cm², 10 mW/cm² and 15 mW/cm² |
Modulation type | pulsed |
---|---|
Pulse width | 500 ns |
Repetition frequency | 662 Hz |
Additional info |
0.5 or 2 µs pulse duration |
Measurand | Value | Type | Method | Mass | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
power density | 75 W/m² | minimum | measured | - | 11.5 mW/cm², 16 mW/cm², 26 mW/cm², 31.5 mW/cm², 38.5 mW/cm², 42 mW/cm² and 48.5 mW/cm² |
At 5.62 GHz, the observing-response rate was not consistently affected until the power density approximated 26 mW/cm². At 1.28 GHz, the observing-response rate of all animals was consistently affected at a power density of 15 mW/cm². Measurements of localized SAR values in a rat-shaped model of simulated muscle tissue revealed marked differences in the absorption pattern between the two frequencies. It is concluded that the animal's observing behavior is disrupted at a lower power density at 1.28 than at 5.62 GHz because of deeper penetration of energy at the lower frequency, and because of frequency-dependent differences in anatomic distribution of the absorbed microwave energy.
This website uses cookies to provide you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this website you accept our use of cookies.