The heating process of an induction hob is based on inductively generated eddy currents. For that purpose, coils are placed beneath the ceramics cooking field to generate an alternating magnetic field. This alternating field induces eddy currents in the metallic cooking pot placed on top of the cooking field which is thereby heated due to its ohmic resistance. Only special cooking pots that are explicitly marked as suitable for inudction cooking can be used. Typcially, these pots are made of ferromagnetic material, such as iron, cobalt or nickel, which forces the alternating magnetic field into the outer regions of the saucepan's floor. This phenomenon known as Skin effect increases the ohmic resistance of the cooking pot and thereby enhances the cooking process. Hysteresis effects caused by the change in magnetization due to the alternating magnetic field equally contribute to the heating process. As part of alternating magnetic field cannot be picked up by the cooking pot, the position of the cooking pot on the cooking plate is decisive for both the cooking process and the exposure of the cook. For minimal cooking time and minimal exposure to magnetic fields, the pot has to be placed exactly on the designated area. Contrary to that, for a coffee pot which never fills out a cooking plate due to its lesser diameter, the optimum position for minimal exposure is generally off center.
Unless otherwise stated, the operating frequency confirms with measured frequency, i.e. the measurement was performed at the operating frequency of the induction stoves.
Measurand | Value | Feature | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
electric field strength | 0.111 mV/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35kHz | maximum given for the whole body of the pregnant woman (including fetus) [1] |
electric field strength | 0.037 V/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 105 kHz | in the body of a pregnant 50 kg woman in the 26 th week of gestation [1] |
electric field strength | 0.093 V/m (maximum) | operating frequency: 35 kHz | maximum simulated value in the body of a 6-year-old boy weighing 19 kg [1] |
electric field strength | 0.111 V/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35 kHz | in the body of a pregnant 50 kg woman in the 26 th week of gestation [1] |
electric field strength | 0.218 V/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 105 kHz | in the body of a pregnant 90 kg woman in the 30 th week of gestation [1] |
electric field strength | 0.281 V/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35 kHz | in the body of a 6-year-old boy weighing 19 kg [1] |
electric field strength | 0.66 V/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35kHz | in the body of a pregnant 90 kg woman in the 30 th week of gestation [1] |
electric field strength | 0.752 V/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 105 kHz | in the body of an 11-year-old girl weighing 36 kg [1] |
electric field strength | 2.28 V/m (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35 kHz | in the body of an 11-year-old girl weighing 36 kg [1] |
electric field strength | 4.3–4.9 V/m (measured) | operating frequencies: 22 - 34 kHz | at a distance of 30 cm [2] |
electric field strength | 10 V/m (maximum) | operating frequencies: 20-60 kHz | at a distance of 10 cm [3] |
electric field strength | 220 V/m (maximum, measured) | measurement bandwidth: 5 Hz - 32 kHz | in the middle of the hob with four pots being heated during the measurement [4] |
current density | 4 mA/m² (maximum, measured) | operating frequency: 20kHz | at a distance of 30 cm [5] |
current density | 5.2 mA/m² (maximum, measured) | operating frequency: 105 kHz | in the body of an 11-year-old girl weighing 36 kg [1] |
current density | 8 mA/m² (maximum, measured) | operating frequency: 20kHz | at a distance of 20 cm [5] |
current density | 9 mA/m² (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 105 kHz | in the body of a pregnant 90 kg woman in the 30 th week of gestation [1] |
current density | 14 mA/m² (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 105kHz | in the body of a pregnant 90 kg woman in the 30 th week of gestation [1] |
current density | 15 mA/m² (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 105 kHz | in the body of a pregnant 50 kg woman in the 26 th week of gestation [1] |
current density | 16 mA/m² (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35 kHz | in the body of an 11-year-old girl weighing 36 kg [1] |
current density | 27 mA/m² (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35kHz | in the body of a 6-year-old boy weighing 19 kg [1] |
current density | 30 mA/m² (maximum, measured) | operating frequency: 20 kHz | at a distance of 10 cm [5] |
current density | 42 mA/m² (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35 kHz | in the body of a pregnant 90 kg woman in the 30 th week of gestation [1] |
current density | 46 mA/m² (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 35 kHz | in the body of a pregnant 50 kg woman in the 26th week of gestation [1] |
current density | 90 mA/m² (maximum, measured) | operating frequency: 20 kHz | at the device end [5] |
magnetic field strength | 0.7–1.6 A/m (measured) | operating frequencies: 22 - 34 kHz | at a distance of 30 cm [2] |
magnetic field strength | 0.7–1.6 A/m (measured) | operating frequencies: 26 - 29 kHz | at a distance of 30 cm [2] |
magnetic flux density | 0.7 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 20.3 kHz | at a distance of 235 mm; power: 1 coil with 2.5 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 2–6 µT (maximum) | operating frequencies: 15 - 25 kHz | at a distance of 20 cm [7] |
magnetic flux density | 2 µT (maximum, measured) | operating frequencies: 15 - 25 kHz | at a distance of 50 cm [7] |
magnetic flux density | 2.596 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 25 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the left side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 0.25 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 2.7 µT | operating frequency: 22.5 kHz | at a distance of 170 mm; power: 1 coil with 6 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 3.02 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned coffee pot; measurement performed from the front side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is even 14.9 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 3.75 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned coffee pot; measurement performed from the left side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is even 20.8 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 4–25 µT (maximum) | operating frequencies: 15 -25 kHz | on the saucepan's base [7] |
magnetic flux density | 5 µT (maximum, measured) | operating frequency: 20 kHz | at a distance of 20 cm; position of the pot: exactly over the induction area [9] |
magnetic flux density | 5.15 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the left side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 0.47 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 5.264 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 25 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the front side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 0.346 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 6.1 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 20.3 kHz | at a distance of 190 mm; power: 1 coil with 5 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 6.4 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned coffee pot; measurement performed from the back side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is even 28 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 6.7 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 19.5 kHz | at a distance of 260 mm, power: 1 coil with 5 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 6.75 µT (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 20 kHz | at a distance of 30 cm [5] |
magnetic flux density | 7.695 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the back side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 0.42 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 8.2 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 19.5 kHz | at a distance of 190 mm; power: 1 coil with 7 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 9.3–47 µT (maximum, measured) | opearting frequency: 20 kHz, mb: 30 Hz - 400 kHz | front left cooking plate is heating, measurement position in front of the front right plate [10] |
magnetic flux density | 9.5–61 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 20 kHz, mbw: 30 Hz - 400 kHz | front right cooking plate is heating, measurement position in front of the heating plate [10] |
magnetic flux density | 10.494 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned coffee pot; measurement performed from the right side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is even 41.18 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 11.217 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the right side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 0.767 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 13.6 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the front side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 1.536 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 19.4 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 22.5 kHz | at a distance of 210 mm; power: 4 coils with 9 kW in total [6] |
magnetic flux density | 20 µT (maximum, measured) | opearting frequency: 20 kHz | at a distance of 30 cm [5] |
magnetic flux density | 21.8 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 22.5 kHz | at a distance of 170 mm; power: 4 coils with 9 kW in total [6] |
magnetic flux density | 22.4 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 21.8 kHz | at a distance of 210 mm; power: 2 coils with each 3.5 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 22.9 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 21.8 kHz | at a distance of 170 mm; power: 4 coils with 9 kW in total [6] |
magnetic flux density | 23.2 µT (measured) | opearting frequency: 19.5 kHz | at a distance of 180 mm; power: 2 coils with each 3.5 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 27.4 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 19.5 kHz | at a distance of 160 mm, power: 2 coils with each 3.5 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 29.9 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the back side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 4.2 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 40 µT (maximum) | operating frequency: 20 kHz | at a distance of 20 cm slightly sloping to the pot at heating level 5 (out of 9); position of the pot: eccentrically over the induction area [9] |
magnetic flux density | 47.8 µT (measured) | - | at a distance of 0 cm for a not-centrally positioned pot; measurement performed from the right side; for comparison, the magnetic flux density of a centrally positioned pot is only 7.46 µT [8] |
magnetic flux density | 52.9 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 19.5 kHz | at a distance of 260 mm, power: 2 coils with each 3.5 kW [6] |
magnetic flux density | 55–84 µT (measured) | operating frequency: 20 kHz, mbw: 30 Hz - 400 kHz | cooking plate consists of only 1 plate, measurement in the middle of this plate [10] |
magnetic flux density | 60 µT (maximum, measured) | operating frequency: 20 kHz | at the device edge [5] |
magnetic flux density | 72 µT (maximum) | operating frequency: 20kHz | at a distance of 20 cm over the pot at heating level 5 (out of 9); position of the pot: eccentrically over the induction area [9] |
magnetic flux density | 300 µT (maximum, simulated) | operating frequency: 20 kHz | at the device edge [5] |
magnetic flux density | 4,000–9,000 µT (maximum) | measurement bandwidth: 5 Hz + 2 kHz | - [11] |
magnetic flux density | 8.032 mT (maximum, calculated) | - | at the surface of the device at 50 Hz [12] |
magnetic flux density | 0.07 T (maximum) | measurement bandwidth: 50 Hz - 10 kHz | - [13] |
This website uses cookies to provide you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this website you accept our use of cookies.