Literature search results

91 articles were found.

The following terms were included: Geburtsfehler, "angeborene Fehlbildung", "kongenitale Anomalie", "congenital abnormality", "birth defect", 先天性欠損

• 2002, Blaasaas KG, Tynes T, Irgens A, Lie RT
  [details] Risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: a population based study [epidem.]
  Occup Environ Med 59 (7): 92-97
• 2001, Lerman Y, Jacubovich R, Green MS
  Pregnancy outcome following exposure to shortwaves among female physiotherapists in Israel [epidem.]
  Am J Ind Med 39 (5): 499-504
• 2001, Krewski D, Byus CV, Glickman BW, Lotz WG, Mandeville R, McBride ML, Prato FS, Weaver DF
  [details] Potential health risks of radiofrequency fields from wireless telecommunication devices [review]
  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 4 (1): 1-143
• 2000, Ryan BM, Polen M, Gauger JR, Mallett Jr E, Kearns MB, Bryan TL, McCormick DL
  Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of 60 Hz magnetic fields and harmonic frequencies in Sprague-Dawley rats [med./bio.]
  Radiat Res 153 (5) Pt 2: 637-641
• 2000, Cobb BL, Jauchem JR, Mason PA, Dooley MP, Miller SA, Ziriax JM, Murphy MR
  [details] Neural and behavioral teratological evaluation of rats exposed to ultra-wideband electromagnetic fields [med./bio.]
  Bioelectromagnetics 21 (7): 524-537
• 1999, Brent RL
  Reproductive and teratologic effects of low-frequency electromagnetic fields: a review of in vivo and in vitro studies using animal models [review]
  Teratology 59 (4): 261-286
• 1999, Robert E
  [details] Intrauterine effects of electromagnetic fields--(low frequency, mid-frequency RF, and microwave): review of epidemiologic studies [review]
  Teratology 59 (4): 292-298
• 1998, Törnqvist S
  Paternal work in the power industry: effects on children at delivery [epidem.]
  J Occup Environ Med 40 (2): 111-117
• 1996, Tas S, Lauwerys R, Lison D
  [details] Occupational hazards for the male reproductive system [review]
  Crit Rev Toxicol 26 (3): 261-307
• 1996, Wartenberg D
  [details] EMFs: cutting through the controversy [review]
  Public Health Rep 111 (3): 204-217