EMF-Portal | Literature search results

2021, van Wel L, Liorni I, Huss A, Thielens A, Wiart J, Joseph W, Röösli M, Foerster M, Massardier-Pilonchery A, Capstick M, Cardis E, Vermeulen R

Radio-frequency electromagnetic field exposure and contribution of sources in the general population: an organ-specific integrative exposure assessment [tech./dosim.]

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 31 (6): 999-1007

2021, Hardell L, Carlberg M

Lost opportunities for cancer prevention: historical evidence on early warnings with emphasis on radiofrequency radiation [basics]

Rev Environ Health 36 (4): 585-597

2021, Modenese A, Gobba F

Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and Health Surveillance According to the European Directive 2013/35/EU [basics]

Int J Environ Res Public Health 18 (4): 1730

2021, Freudenstein F, Croft RJ, Loughran SP, Zeleke BM, Wiedemann PM

[details] Effects of selective outcome reporting on risk perception [risk]

Environ Res 196: 110821

2021, Romeo S, Zeni O, Sannino A, Lagorio S, Biffoni M, Scarfì MR

Genotoxicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: Protocol for a systematic review of in vitro studies [basics]

Environ Int 148: 106386

2021, Winter L, Seifert F, Zilberti L, Murbach M, Ittermann B

J Magn Reson Imaging 53 (6): 1646-1665

2020, Bidi M

Biological risk assessment of high-voltage transmission lines on worker's health of electric society [tech./dosim.]

Arch Electr Eng 69 (1): 57-68

2020

[Procedure for the assessment of the exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields; German version EN 50499:2019] [guideline]

German Commission for Electrical, Electronic & Information Technologies of DIN and VDE (DKE), DIN EN 50499 VDE 0848-499:2020-12

2020, Kaneshiro T, Kamioka M, Hijioka N, Yamada S, Yokokawa T, Misaka T, Hikichi T, Yoshihisa A, Takeishi Y

Characteristics of Esophageal Injury in Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using a High-Power Short-Duration Setting [elec. inj.]

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 13 (10): e008602

2020, Iwatsuki K, Yoneda H, Onishi T, Ishii H, Kurimoto S, Yamamoto M, Tatebe M, Hirata H

Compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with orthopedic implants: manufacturer questionnaires [dev./impl.]

Nagoya J Med Sci 82 (1): 79-84

2020, Barudov E, Ivanova M

Study of Electromagnetic Fields in Buildings in the Vicinity of a Marine Radar Installation [tech./dosim.]

2020 12th Electrical Engineering Faculty Conference (BulEF), Varna, Bulgaria. IEEE: pp. 1-5; ISBN 978-1-7281-9440-0

2020, Goudswaard ML, van den Hondel KE, Reijnders UJL, Reijnen G, van der Werf C, van Kleffens T, Berns AP, Koppen H, Vis JC

[Tasered: medical consequences of the use of electric stun guns] [foreign-language]

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 164: D4422

2020, Schmidt J

[5G – the new generation of mobile technologies and its effects on humans] [basics]

UMID 2: 25-34

2020, Sharma A, Shrivastava S, Shukla S

Exposure of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Biochemical and Pathological Alterations [med./bio.]

Neurol India 68 (5): 1092-1100

2020, Jargin S

Radiofrequency Radiation: Ways to the Risk Assessment [comment]

Dose Response 18 (3): 1559325820959557

2020, Magiera A, Solecka J

Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation from Wi-fi and its effects on human health, in particular children and adolescents. Review [basics]

Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 71 (3): 251-259

2020, Holtstiege V, Meier C, Bietenbeck M, Chatzantonis G, Florian A, Köbe J, Reinke F, Eckardt L, Yilmaz A

Clinical experience regarding safety and diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with a subcutaneous implanted cardioverter/defibrillator (S-ICD) at 1.5 T [dev./impl.]

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22 (1): 35

2020, Koh TH, Choi JW, Seo M, Choi HD, Kim K

[details] Factors Affecting Risk Perception of Electromagnetic Waves From 5G Network Base Stations [risk]

Bioelectromagnetics 41 (7): 491-499

2020, Hardell L, Carlberg M

Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest [comment]

Oncol Lett 20 (4): 15

2020, Freudenstein F, Croft RJ, Wiedemann PM, Verrender A, Böhmert C, Loughran SP

[details] Framing Effects in Risk Communication Messages - Hazard Identification vs. Risk Assessment [risk]

Environ Res 190: 109934

2020, Driessen S, Bodewein L, Dechent D, Graefrath D, Schmiedchen K, Stunder D, Kraus T, Petri AK

[details] Biological and health-related effects of weak static magnetic fields (≤ 1 mT) in humans and vertebrates: A systematic review [review]

PLoS One 15 (6): e0230038

2020, Bireley M, Kovach JR, Morton C, Cava JR, Pan AY, Nugent M, Samyn MM

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Children is Safe with Most Pacemaker Systems, Including Those with Epicardial Leads [dev./impl.]

Pediatr Cardiol 41 (4): 801-808

2020, Geronikolou SA, Johansson Ӧ, Chrousos G, Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Cokkinos D

[details] Cellular Phone User's Age or the Duration of Calls Moderate Autonomic Nervous System? A Meta-Analysis [review]

Vlamos P (ed.): GeNeDis 2018. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, volume 1194; Springer, New York; pp. 475-488; ISBN 978-3-030-32621-0

2020, Alhasnawi MKL, Abdulla S, Fatseas D, Addie RG

Spectral density constraints on wireless communication [tech./dosim.]

Heliyon 6 (5): e03979

2020, Brix G, Günther E, Rössler U, Endesfelder D, Kamp A, Beer A, Eiber M

Double-strand breaks in lymphocyte DNA of humans exposed to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and the static magnetic field in PET/MRI [med./bio.]

EJNMMI Res 10 (1): 43