Study type:
Study regarding implants/medical devices
(observational study)
Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones
dev./impl.
By:
Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW, Estes 3rd M, Griffith JL, Steffens RA, Carlo GL, Findlay GK, Johnson CM
Published in: N Engl J Med 1997; 336 (21): 1473-1479
Exposure
No exposure details are available.
Study funded by
-
Wireless Technology, Inc., USA
Comments on this article
Related articles
-
Ismail MM et al.
(2010):
Third-generation mobile phones (UMTS) do not interfere with permanent implanted pacemakers
-
Tandogan I et al.
(2005):
The effects of mobile phones on pacemaker function
-
Trigano A et al.
(2005):
Reliability of electromagnetic filters of cardiac pacemakers tested by cellular telephone ringing
-
Tri JL et al.
(2004):
Potential for Personal Digital Assistant interference with implantable cardiac devices
-
Barbaro V et al.
(2003):
On the mechanisms of interference between mobile phones and pacemakers: parasitic demodulation of GSM signal by the sensing amplifier
-
Hekmat K et al.
(2003):
[Little Interference of Cellular Phones on Modern Pacemakers]
-
Elshershari H et al.
(2002):
Influence of D-net (EUROPEAN GSM-standard) cellular telephones on implanted pacemakers in children
-
Trigano AJ et al.
(1999):
Electromagnetic interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and digital cellular phones: experimental study
-
Steffens RA et al.
(1999):
A comparison of Clinical and Bench Test Results from Pacemaker/Wireless Phone Interference Studies: Does Bench Testing Adequately Predict Clinical Pacemaker Interference?
-
Schlegel RE et al.
(1998):
Electromagnetic compatibility study of the in-vitro interaction of wireless phones with cardiac pacemakers
-
Sparks PB et al.
(1996):
The safety of digital mobile cellular telephones with minute ventilation rate adaptive pacemakers
-
Nowak B et al.
(1996):
Is there a risk for interaction between mobile phones and single lead VDD pacemakers?
-
Barbaro V et al.
(1995):
Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients?
