Study type:
Epidemiological study
(observational study)
Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study
epidem.
By:
Elliott P, Toledano MB, Bennett J, Beale L, de Hoogh K, Best N, Briggs DJ
Published in: BMJ 2010; 340: c3077
Aim of study (acc. to author)
Further details
The four national mobile phone operators provided data on all base stations (GSM 900 and 1800) including site identifier, coordinates (to an accuracy of about 10 m), number of antennas per base station, antenna orientation (azimuth), type (sectoral, omni-directional), height above ground level, total (electrical and mechanical) tilt, lateral and vertical beam width (degrees), total power output (effective isotropic radiated power), and frequency (MHz). The three exposure estimates distance, total power output and modelled power density were calculated based on this data.
Endpoint/type of risk estimation
Type of risk estimation:
(odds ratio (OR))
Exposure
Assessment
Exposure groups
Group
|
Description
|
Reference group 1
|
distance from the nearest mobile phone base station: ≥ 1071.8 m
|
Group 2
|
distance from the nearest mobile phone base station: 612.1 - 1071.7 m
|
Group 3
|
distance from the nearest mobile phone base station: 0 - 612.0 m
|
Reference group 4
|
total power output: 0 kW
|
Group 5
|
total power output: 0.001-4.742 kW
|
Group 6
|
total power output: ≥ 4.743 kW
|
Reference group 7
|
modelled power density: 0 - 0.002256 mW/m²
|
Group 8
|
modelled power density: 0.002257 - 0.016996 mW/m²
|
Group 9
|
modelled power density: ≥ 0.016997 mW/m²
|
Population
-
Group:
-
Age:
0–4 years
-
Observation period:
1999 - 2001
-
Study location:
Great Britain
Case group
Control group
-
Selection:
-
Matching:
- sex
- age
- case:control = 1:4
Study size
|
Cases |
Controls |
Eligible |
1,926 |
6,222 |
Evaluable |
1,397 |
5,588 |
Statistical analysis method:
- conditional logistic regression
(
adjustment:
)
Results (acc. to author)
Study funded by
-
Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR), UK
Comments on this article
Related articles
-
Hauri DD et al.
(2014):
Exposure to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields From Broadcast Transmitters and Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Census-based Cohort Study
-
Li CY et al.
(2012):
A population-based case-control study of radiofrequency exposure in relation to childhood neoplasm
-
Aydin D et al.
(2011):
Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study
-
Schmiedel S et al.
(2009):
[Childhood leukemia in relation to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields emitted from television and radio broadcast transmitters: results of a case-control study]
-
Merzenich H et al.
(2008):
Childhood leukemia in relation to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of TV and radio broadcast transmitters
-
Neubauer G et al.
(2007):
Feasibility of future epidemiological studies on possible health effects of mobile phone base stations
-
Kheifets L et al.
(2005):
The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields
-
Michelozzi P et al.
(2002):
Adult and childhood leukemia near a high-power radio station in Rome, Italy
-
McKenzie DR et al.
(1998):
Childhood incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and exposure to broadcast radiation in Sydney - a second look
-
Dolk H et al.
(1997):
Cancer incidence near radio and television transmitters in Great Britain. II. All high power transmitters
-
Dolk H et al.
(1997):
Cancer incidence near radio and television transmitters in Great Britain. I. Sutton Coldfield transmitter
-
O'Carroll MJ
(1997):
High voltage power lines and risk of cancer. Conclusions are unjustified
-
Gurney JG et al.
(1996):
Childhood brain tumor occurrence in relation to residential power line configurations, electric heating sources, and electric appliance use
-
Hocking B et al.
(1996):
Cancer incidence and mortality and proximity to TV towers
-
Maskarinec G et al.
(1994):
Investigation of increased incidence in childhood leukemia near radio towers in Hawaii: preliminary observations