Literature search results

1177 articles were found.

The following terms were included: ハザード, Gefährdungspotenzial, Hazard

• 1993, Jacobson JI
  Jacobson resonance is the basis from which to evaluate potential hazard and therapeutic benefit from extrinsic magnetic fields [tech./dosim.]
  Panminerva Med 35 (3): 138-148
• 1993, Salford LG, Eberhardt JL, Persson BR
  [details] Permeability of the blood-brain barrier induced by 915 MHz electromagnetic radiation, continuous wave and modulated at 8, 16, 50 and 200 Hz [med./bio.]
  Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 30: 293-301
• 1992, Steer RG
  [details] Delayed fetal death following electrical injury in the first trimester [elec. inj.]
  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 32 (4): 377-378
• 1992, Tubbs RL, Moss CE, Fleeger A
  Health Hazard Evaluation Report No 89-364-2202: ARMCO Advanced Materials Corporation (Butler, Pennsylvania) [info]
  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), U.S. Public Health Service (PHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), HETA 89-364-2202: 1-40
• 1992, Harvey-Sutton PL, Driscoll TR, Frommer MS, Harrison JE
  Work-related electrical fatalities in Australia, 1982-1984 [elec. inj.]
  Scand J Work Environ Health 18 (5): 293-297
• 1992
  Electromagnetic Fields and the Risk of Cancer [review]
  National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), Documents of the NRPB, Volume 3 No.1: 1-138
• 1992, Roth BJ, Pascual-Leone A, Cohen LG, Hallett M
  The heating of metal electrodes during rapid-rate magnetic stimulation: a possible safety hazard [med. app.]
  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85 (2): 116-123
• 1992, Budinger TF
  Emerging nuclear magnetic resonance technologies. Health and safety [review]
  Ann N Y Acad Sci 649: 1-18
• 1992, Jauchem JR
  Epidemiologic studies of electric and magnetic fields and cancer: a case study of distortions by the media [basics]
  J Clin Epidemiol 45 (10): 1137-1142
• 1992, Foster KR
  Health effects of low-level electromagnetic fields: phantom or not-so-phantom risk? [review]
  Health Phys 62 (5): 429-435