Study overviews

Please note that a publication can be assigned to several endpoints, i.e. the sum of publications from the individual thematic points and subpoints can be greater than the total sum of actual publications.

Experimental studies on static magnetic fields

2222 studies in total
  1. 972 studies
  2. 743 studies
  3. 461 studies
  4. 396 studies
  5. 355 studies
  6. 173 studies

Other

972 studies in total
  1. 369 studies
  2. 267 studies
  3. 258 studies
  4. 163 studies

Effects on invertebrates 163 studies in total

Authors Year Exposed system Parameters Magnetic flux density/field strength
Cheng L et al. 2022 invertebrate, <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> (nematode; different strains) static magnetic field -
Liu Z et al. 2023 invertebrate, <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> (nematode; different strains) static magnetic field -
Krylov VV et al. 2019 invertebrate, <i>Daphnia magna</i> Straus (great water flea) geomagnetic field -
Krylov VV et al. 2013 invertebrate, <i>Daphnia magna</i> Straus (great water flea) and <i>Daphnia carinata</i> King geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation 51.7 µT
Levengood WC 1987 invertebrate, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> digital mobile phone, mobile communications, static magnetic field 630 mT
Stamenkovic-Radak M et al. 2001 invertebrate, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> static magnetic field -
Zhang B et al. 2004 invertebrate, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> static magnetic field, geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation 100–680 nT
Takashima Y et al. 2004 invertebrate, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> static magnetic field, DC, co-exposure 1–14 T
Portelli LA et al. 2012 invertebrate, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> magnetic field, static magnetic field, low frequency, 50/60 Hz, DC, co-exposure, shielding/field deprivation 0.201–42.5 µT
Kale PG et al. 1979 invertebrate, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> static magnetic field, DC 1.3–3.7 T