Please note that a publication can be assigned to several endpoints, i.e. the sum of publications from the individual thematic points and subpoints can be greater than the total sum of actual publications.
Authors | Year | Exposed system | Parameters | Magnetic flux density/field strength |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ge S et al. | 2019 | invertebrate, zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) larvae | static magnetic field | - |
Paul AL et al. | 2006 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> | static magnetic field | 0–30 T |
Xu C et al. | 2018 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> | static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation | - |
Islam M et al. | 2020 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> | geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation | - |
Vigani G et al. | 2021 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> | geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation | - |
Zhou X et al. | 2024 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> | static magnetic field | - |
Dhiman SK et al. | 2018 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> Heynh. ecotype <i>Landsberg erecta</i> and <i>cry1cry2</I> mutant | static magnetic field, DC | - |
Agliassa C et al. | 2018 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype <i>Columbia</I>, <i>cry1cry2</i>, <i>phyA</i>, <i>phyAphyB</i> and <i>phot1</I> mutants (seeds) | geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation, co-exposure | - |
Xu C et al. | 2021 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype Columbia Col‐4 wild‐type and cry1/cry2 mutant | static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation | - |
Paponov IA et al. | 2021 | plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype Columbia-0 (<i>Col-0</i>) wild type | geomagnetic field, static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation | - |
This website uses cookies to provide you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this website you accept our use of cookies.