Study type:
Study regarding implants/medical devices
Pacemaker reed switch behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units: are reed switches always closed in strong magnetic fields?
dev./impl.
By:
Luechinger R, Duru F, Zeijlemaker VA, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R
Published in: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25 (10): 1419-1423
Exposure
Related articles
-
Nordbeck P et al.
(2009):
Measuring RF-induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads
-
Naehle CP et al.
(2009):
Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5-T in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
-
Nordbeck P et al.
(2008):
[Safety of cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in magnetic resonance imaging. Assessment of the aggregate function at 1.5 tesla]
-
Ryf S et al.
(2008):
Interference of neodymium magnets with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: an in vitro study
-
Calcagnini G et al.
(2008):
In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: Role of implant geometry
-
Naehle CP et al.
(2008):
Safety of brain 3-T MR imaging with transmit-receive head coil in patients with cardiac pacemakers: pilot prospective study with 51 examinations
-
Duru F et al.
(2001):
MR imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers
-
Sommer T et al.
(2000):
MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T
-
Achenbach S et al.
(1997):
Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes
-
Pavlicek W et al.
(1983):
The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance on patients with cardiac pacemakers
