Study type:
Epidemiological study
(observational study)
Exposure to Magnetic Field Non-Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Miscarriage: A Prospective Cohort Study
epidem.
By:
Li DK, Chen H, Ferber JR, Odouli R, Quesenberry C
Published in: Sci Rep 2017; 7: 17541
Aim of study (acc. to author)
Further details
Measurement days were divided into typical days (measurements were conducted during a typical day of the pregnancy) and non-typical days based on the participants' diaries.
Endpoint/type of risk estimation
Exposure
Assessment
Exposure groups
Group
|
Description
|
Reference group 1
|
99th percentile of exposure: < 0.25 µT (1st quartile)
|
Group 2
|
99th percentile of exposure: ≥ 0.25 µT
|
Reference group 3
|
99th percentile of exposure, typical day: < 0.25 µT (1st quartile)
|
Group 4
|
99th percentile of exposure, typical day: 0.25 - 0.36 µT (2nd quartile)
|
Group 5
|
99th percentile of exposure, typical day: 0.37 - 0.62 µT (3rd quartile)
|
Group 6
|
99th percentile of exposure, typical day: > 0.63 µT (4th quartile)
|
Population
-
Group:
-
Age:
≥ 18 years
-
Characteristics:
pregnant women with gestational age at pregnancy test of 10 complete weeks or less
-
Observation period:
not stated
-
Study location:
USA (San Francisco Bay Area)
-
Data source:
cohort of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, USA
Study size
Type |
Value |
Total |
1,627 |
Participants |
1,054 |
Evaluable |
913 |
Statistical analysis method:
- Cox proportional regressions analysis
(
adjustment:
- education
- maternal age, race, smoking since last menstrual period, prior miscarriage. Further adjustment for maternal nausea/vomiting, maternal income, marital status, alcohol use, caffeine intake, maternal fever, vaginal bleeding, urinary tract infection, carrying loads > 4.5 kg, exposure to solvents or degreasers, vitamin intake and Jacuzzi/hot tub/steam room/sauna use during pregnancy
)
Results (acc. to author)
Study funded by
-
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), North Carolina, USA
Comments on this article
-
Li DK et al.
(2021):
Editorial Expression of Concern: Exposure to Magnetic Field Non-Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Miscarriage: A Prospective Cohort Study
-
Grimes DR et al.
(2021):
Association between magnetic field exposure and miscarriage risk is not supported by the data
Related articles
-
de Souza S et al.
(2021):
High prevalence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: A socioenvironmental spatial analysis
-
Ingle ME et al.
(2020):
Association of personal exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields with pregnancy outcomes among women seeking fertility treatment in a longitudinal cohort study
-
Auger N et al.
(2019):
Maternal proximity to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and risk of birth defects
-
Esmailzadeh S et al.
(2019):
Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields of High Voltage Overhead Power Lines and Female Infertility
-
Ren Y et al.
(2019):
Prenatal exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic field and its impact on fetal growth
-
Ruan G et al.
(2019):
Power-frequency magnetic fields at 50 Hz do not affect fertility and development in rats and mice
-
Eskelinen T et al.
(2016):
Maternal exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields: Association with time to pregnancy and foetal growth
-
de Vocht F et al.
(2014):
Maternal residential proximity to sources of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and adverse birth outcomes in a UK cohort
-
Tan TC et al.
(2014):
Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated with Threatened Miscarriage: A Case-Control Study
-
Su XJ et al.
(2014):
Correlation between exposure to magnetic fields and embryonic development in the first trimester
-
Wang Q et al.
(2013):
Residential exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields and the association with miscarriage risk: a 2-year prospective cohort study
-
Shamsi Mahmoudabadi F et al.
(2013):
Exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion: a case-control study
-
Mahram M et al.
(2013):
The effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on pregnancy and fetal growth and development
-
Malagoli C et al.
(2012):
Maternal exposure to magnetic fields from high-voltage power lines and the risk of birth defects
-
Auger N et al.
(2012):
Stillbirth and residential proximity to extremely low frequency power transmission lines: a retrospective cohort study
-
Blaasaas KG et al.
(2004):
Risk of selected birth defects by maternal residence close to power lines during pregnancy
-
Blaasaas KG et al.
(2002):
Risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: a population based study
-
Li DK et al.
(2002):
A population-based prospective cohort study of personal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage
-
Lee GM et al.
(2002):
A nested case-control study of residential and personal magnetic field measures and miscarriages
-
Juutilainen J et al.
(1993):
Early pregnancy loss and exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields
-
Lindbohm ML et al.
(1992):
Magnetic fields of video display terminals and spontaneous abortion